From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 09:05:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F321816A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:05:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thekla.de.clara.net (thekla.de.clara.net [212.82.225.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F79743D46 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jesk@killall.org) Received: from localhost.de.clara.net ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by thekla.de.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CRRwV-000H3Z-Ql; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:05:35 +0100 Received: from kamikaze-studio.int.de.clara.net ([192.168.0.232]) by thekla.de.clara.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CRRwV-000H3V-Ll; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:05:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:05:35 +0100 From: jesk To: "Thordur Ivar B." , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20041108191351.370c2d5d.thib@mi.is> References: <1099935987.4899.1730.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <200411081334.18009.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1099940205.4899.1733.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20041108191351.370c2d5d.thib@mi.is> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Mysql - Linuxthreads : Still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jesk@killall.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:05:38 -0000 > It would be nice if you could post the resaults back to the list so other > do not have to go through these steps and maybe create an interesting > disccusion about the use of linuxthreads with MySQL or the "new" > threading lib in fbsd. > > I my self am about to embark on quest to upgrade my servers from 4.10 to > 5.3-RELEASE and resault from a test like this would be greatly > appriceated since then I (and propably many others) will not have to > duplicate the efforts. > > Anyways, I could always run some tests to for comparisment. I did a performance comparison with different threading methods. Look for MySQL Performance thread on current@