From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 19 3:28:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883A537B422 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 03:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA19630; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:28:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Will Andrews Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/21380: portlint is stupid. References: <200009190030.RAA79490@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000918234052.O35550@radon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000919045347.T35550@radon.gryphonsoft.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Sep 2000 12:28:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2000 04:53:47 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews writes: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The -v option also drops lots of other tests. > Got a better way to do this? I don't want to add a lot of extra options > to specify which tests should be built and which shouldn't. That would > just be butt-ugly. Fix portlint so it understand that ports that have no distfiles also have no checksum file. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message