Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 07:54:44 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile src/bin/sh Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cpp Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/gdb/gdb Makefile src/lib/libpcap Makefile src/libexec/ftpd Makefile ... Message-ID: <199710060554.HAA14729@greenpeace.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Isn't the second 'all' redundant here: > > Yeah, I thought this myself but left it in there during testing > since I wasn't 100% sure and was more concerned with verifying > the patch (that and the diffs which re-enabled TCPWRAPPERS by > default for sendmail makes me think that these patches were generated > a bit oddly to begin with - we should probably be more selective > in the future :-). This is where I stand up and take blame. The TCPWRAPPERS was my fault. I gave Jordan patches relative to my tree, including them by mistake. I don't know about the double "all" though. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710060554.HAA14729>