From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu May 10 21: 1:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2FD1F37B423; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from ade@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4B41fA07283;
	Thu, 10 May 2001 21:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ade)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 21:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200105110401.f4B41fA07283@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: needo@superhero.org, ade@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	ade@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/27260: Nautilus port does not build.
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Nautilus port does not build.

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: ade
State-Changed-When: Thu May 10 20:59:02 PDT 2001
State-Changed-Why: 
Looks like a victim of the freetype2/XFree86 vs. freetype2/port mess.
I planned on looking at this post GNOME 1.4 so I'll use this one
as a convenient reminder.  BTW, nautilus doesn't do anything useful
under FreeBSD yet, so it's no great loss.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->ade
Responsible-Changed-By: ade
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 10 20:59:02 PDT 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I'm going to look at this freetype2 mess soon.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27260

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message