From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 8 06:02:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B08549 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B560CC8 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2013 01:02:39 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id CEF21851; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:02:38 -0500 X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from pool-173-70-92-11.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([173.70.92.11]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2013 01:02:38 -0500 Message-ID: <50EBB67E.3040704@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:02:38 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120820 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: smbfs slow compared to smbclient Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Boris Popov , Tom Pepper X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:02:43 -0000 Hello! I found this same question asked back in 2005, but never answered: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-September/098717.html Today, 7 years later, using FreeBSD-9.1 I observe, that copying a file to an SMB-server (a box with embedded Linux, actually), I get just under 1Mb/s using an smbfs mount. On contrast, uploading the same file to the same remote host using smbclient runs at between 8 and 9 Mb/s. Is this a known discrepancy? Are there tweaks to be applied to the smbfs mount, that can make it perform better? Thanks! Yours, -mi