Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 08:12:19 +0100 From: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r345067 - in head/devel/smv: . files Message-ID: <20140307081219.fc2a4fbeacf6ba0f7226b18b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140307021059.GA42209@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402191122.s1JBM2Rl097476@svn.freebsd.org> <20140307021059.GA42209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:22:02AM +0000, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > New Revision: 345067 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/345067 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r345067/ > > > > +USE_GCC= yes > > [...] > > + EXEC = smv > > +-CC = gcc > > ++CC ?= gcc > > Was this part intended? It's was not mentioned in the log. How hard Yes. This port was not CC safe. Without it gcc would obviously be forced and failed on systems withouth gcc in the base i.e. 10.0-RELEASE. > would it be to fix the port to build properly with Clang? I don't know, I haven't tried. Why don't you give it a try? My priority at the moment is staging along with things I see on the go. There is always more that could be done. > Also, INSTALL_MAN was heavily abused instead of INSTALL_DATA, it > seems. Agree. Now that you've noticed it and thanks to the released approval policy you can go ahead and fix it right away! :-) Emanuel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140307081219.fc2a4fbeacf6ba0f7226b18b>