From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jan 13 15: 9: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA5C150BA; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:09:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA33905; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:08:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <200001132308.PAA33905@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: We need to do an audit of our "crypto", both current and planned. In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000113155651.01d15370@localhost> from Brett Glass at "Jan 13, 2000 03:57:21 pm" To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:08:44 -0800 (PST) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), markm@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > At 10:23 AM 1/13/2000 , Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > >So that we can obey this clause of the new export agreement: > > > >Encryption source code which is available to the public and which is > >subject to an express agreement for the payment of a licensing fee or > > This should be "not subject to." I sure hope that it is ``not subject to'', I was reading that and thinking real hard just how the open source world was going to get around the fact that they needed, not only, to take a payment, but also create an ``express agreement'' for that payment :-) -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message