From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 00:32:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5962E1065670 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 00:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A8A8FC14 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 00:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so98054wib.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 17:32:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=kGMR5IC/B6cnIw7pdyTgdjYVzzZji9NKYwCOfThk/GA=; b=gy4DJi0ZS/COtLm2xLhdjCMki3VbwHIr0rTZj10ZMz1TJbFNVAP+npu52xkzMtULJp cxn5BAqZsaeNfwBHw1H//EYrqQlZU63+Gdmr4d16vt+CO9vcYObsHw42Q9xGz7+sLlQi UApAK9vULlt5euN7cBKJftW6ehrfP2yGQibrhCJQZ3WCv67hBVM1SQSz1KSDvsmNrgCK W6h1tjJ/TLQRt0ZEBEWFHj5pUxRQNUFnz6/wDsbdDVea3JSx+zyQlK27v++5e5HlbPmk pI84lgcdmeJ2PTRHvY1phOuPh4iHvFvbEIYA03Kzl5sP89JI67eYoLJKElovg6HrzNu3 /sIA== Received: by 10.216.141.226 with SMTP id g76mr10612023wej.67.1336437129830; Mon, 07 May 2012 17:32:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: juli@clockworksquid.com Received: by 10.180.146.169 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 17:31:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juli Mallett Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:31:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xY941MKd6nv3zqUuy-guFQ8jjtY Message-ID: To: Jack Vogel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmfjTOpQ/GJ0xocTVJf+4+/BO9eUlzlrEUbZAhJnSX9niRcnqyE/Rse5+LAZY0YrV3zr0Vc Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Vijay Singh Subject: Re: What does adapter->stats.mpc[] report for ixgbe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 00:32:11 -0000 While we're on the subject, I've had some confusion for some time now: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Packets are missed when the receive FIFO has insufficient space to store the > incoming packet. This means the on-card FIFO, i.e. the fixed-size FIFO that is divided into receive and transmit space by the driver, right? And the separate "receive no buffers" counter records instances where the packet made it to the card but there was no buffer associated with a receive descriptor to write it to? That has been my interpretation of the documentation and the numbers I've seen in practice, but I've seen conflicting interpretations and would much rather hear it from the horse's mouth :) Thanks, Juli.