Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:29:52 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bind to port <1024 in jail
Message-ID:  <ed1f68a0-b436-d4f7-4de5-0afb9e86b1c9@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <36614699-F6E0-495D-8EC0-FCF4B1B12BA3@bway.net>
References:  <75536186-7D58-498C-BFC6-9284EB7CB444@lassitu.de> <1534777490.27158.47.camel@freebsd.org> <36614699-F6E0-495D-8EC0-FCF4B1B12BA3@bway.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
21.08.2018 1:37, Charles Sprickman via freebsd-stable wrote:

> I am so behind on all the new toys in the system.  I was very embarrassed
> to find out about this feature from someone who’s primarily working
> with Linux in his day job.  He was just looking to bind an Elixir app to 80/443
> without running as root and he shared this:
> 
> security.mac.portacl.rules=gid:2001:tcp:80,gid:2001:tcp:443
> 
> We stuck that in sysctl.conf and that was that.

This is not so new: mac_portacl is here since 8.0-RELEASE.

> I wish FreeBSD still had the evangelism folks that would go out and
> tell the userbase and anyone else that would listen about all the cool
> new stuff. :)

Well, we still have Release Notes for every major or minor release.
Get a habit reading it once a release and you'll know it all.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ed1f68a0-b436-d4f7-4de5-0afb9e86b1c9>