Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:59:30 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <20080607215930.000034e6@westmark> In-Reply-To: <37414AAF-C75A-4292-A174-2198BEF2A7DF@netconsonance.com> References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846E637.9080101@samsco.org> <BFF61274-C192-4361-9DEB-93DED2E02CA7@netconsonance.com> <48472DB6.5030909@samsco.org> <6010676B-91B0-4AF8-ACF8-039A59B29331@netconsonance.com> <484736E0.6090004@samsco.org> <C69AC20A-225C-478D-B0C8-B2F018B555C6@netconsonance.com> <4847D5F8.80605@FreeBSD.org> <37414AAF-C75A-4292-A174-2198BEF2A7DF@netconsonance.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700 Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> wrote: > Why does it make sense for FreeBSD to stop supporting a stable > version and force people to choose between two different unstable > versions? Is this really the right thing to do? NO, it's not. But you can't change that. The maintainers run the show. It's their time and their baby. And from one pov that's true. Users have to shut up if not contributing big time. I still think your questions are legitimate. You won't win the battle however. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D ++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080607215930.000034e6>