From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Mar 24  9:50:20 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C46A37B401
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BE843FAF
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:50:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2OHoINS048950
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:50:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h2OHoIgR048949;
	Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200303241750.h2OHoIgR048949@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: kern/50216: kernel panic on 5.0-current when use ipfw2 with dynamic rules
Reply-To: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
	tests=none
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/50216; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, lazyking@hotmail.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/50216: kernel panic on 5.0-current when use ipfw2 with dynamic rules
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:52:04 -0500

 I have experienced this problem as well, on three 5.0-R boxes (one an
 alpha). It seems to manifest itself when using limit rules in the
 firewall. I can successfully use keep-state/setup rules on all of
 these machines. I have not had time to look into the source due to
 work/school constraints. I figured I would put in my experience to
 help out luigi or whomever else decides to hash this out.
 
 --
 coleman kane

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message