From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 21 0:48:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.noos.fr (aragon.noos.net [212.198.2.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC24937B405 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 60572918 invoked by uid 0); 21 Nov 2001 08:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cdlpc) ([212.198.229.145]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.75 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Nov 2001 08:48:29 -0000 Message-ID: <002c01c17269$498574a0$91e5c6d4@cybercable.fr> Reply-To: "Cyrille Lefevre" From: "Cyrille Lefevre" To: "Edwin Groothuis" , References: <200111210230.fAL2U1084437@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/31229: new port: astro/linux-setiathome-i686 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:48:25 +0100 Organization: ACME MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Edwin Groothuis" wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/31229; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 12:10:02PM -0700, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > The following reply was made to PR ports/31229; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > > > Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > > here is the master/slave port version of linux-setiathome-i686. > > it seems to install/deinstall well. unfortunately, I can't test > > it since I only have a P166... > > I euh.. I honestly don't like the link between the two packages. > I agree that they could be linked together, because they're both > coming from the same source and are the same kind of application. > But because of the possibilities of having unsynced versions (for > example for MacOS/X they are at version 3.05 while the rest of the > world is at 3.03) I would prefer it to keep the two ports seperated. I don't see any problem. in this case, it's still possible to add PORTVERSION in astro/linux-setiathome-i686 and to change it to ?= in astro/setiathome. Cyrille. - -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBO/t4ZhrcilDwD0PGEQI89gCcDTHsbKw9Pa0XAcunLlXC6Y3MN8kAnjMs BRFi4yCn8AhNxzBXNYUulvJW =y6hC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message