Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:26:41 +0200
From:      Mister Olli <mister.olli@googlemail.com>
To:        Nicolas Letellier <nicolas@nicoelro.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Secure apache with php
Message-ID:  <1247153201.4645.2.camel@phoenix.blechhirn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090709160550.40c9f6c4@belegost.nicoelro.net>
References:  <20090709113534.43373278@belegost.nicoelro.net> <EA9FE81A7F144C89AFCD0E9390FD69FC@rivendell> <20090709122212.658bcc24@belegost.nicoelro.net> <1247136597.2653.15.camel@frodon.be-bif.ulb.ac.be> <20090709134329.0f86c78b@belegost.nicoelro.net> <1247142971.2653.19.camel@frodon.be-bif.ulb.ac.be> <20090709160550.40c9f6c4@belegost.nicoelro.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I'm currently using mpm-itk (on debian, but should be replaced with
freebsd soon ;-)).

I'm quite happy with the solution as it's easy to setup many user
accounts for web without ugly access right stuff and all that. apache
never made a problem after setup :-)

unfortunately I've never had the time to do futher hardening for mpm-itk
in special (only 'standard' apache/php hardening is applied). but as I'm
planning to keep this setup and extend userbase after move to freebsd
I'm curious what your results will be.

Regards,
---
Mr. Olli


On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:05 +0200, Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> Le Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:36:11 +0200,
> Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be> a écrit :
> 
> > > When I tested php in cgi, performances were bad. That's why,
> > > php_mod is better (in my case !=
> > > 
> > 
> > It's not CGI, it's FastCGI.
> > There is no performance loss if you use an opcode cacher (like
> > x-cache).
> > 
> And is anyboy use mpm-itk ?
> I'm interested more with this solution than another php fix (like
> safe_mode, open_basedir or cgi/fastcie).
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1247153201.4645.2.camel>