From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 11:05:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592A116A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:05:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C0D43D5A; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:05:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2OJ5rhV070928; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:05:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i2OJ5qjC070925; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:05:53 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:05:52 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20040321124606.1013f682@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Message-ID: <20040324130623.Q62958@blues.jpj.net> References: <200403201452.i2KEqJ9b039309@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040321042730.V93457@blues.jpj.net> <20040321124606.1013f682@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: trevor@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/lame Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:05:14 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > AFAIK: Restricted implies "do not distribute the source". But > distributing the source is ok. Only distributing binary packages is > questionable. That's the reason we don't offer binaries at SF. By giving someone the sources, we make it easier for someone to use LAME. IANAL but this might be "contributory infringement." For instance, there are at least two FreeBSD distributors in the United States, which has software patents, and where the law says: (a) Except as otherwise provided in this title [35 USC 1 et seq.], whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent. (b) Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer. -- > I talked with another developer of lame, he knows more about the legal > restrictions. He told me that he and another guy are distributing > binaries of lame on their own. So far Thomson is either not aware of > this (but both people distribute lame since a long time), or Thomson > doesn't care about them (either because lame is distributed for free, or > because some people at Thomson have enough knowledge to know they aren't > able to get (enough) money out of something which is distributed for > free), or Thomson doesn't thinks they are manufacturers (even if one of > the developers of lame distributes binaries on his own). > > I hadn't marked lame as some kind of restricted so far, since Thomson > wants to see money only from developers or from manufacturers (see > http://www.mp3licensing.com/)). I don't see us as manufacturers, but > Trevor told me, we could be interpreted as manufacturers. > > Since english isn't my native language, and I may not be aware of every > aspect of the word "manufacturer", I suggest to discuss this and tell me > about the final outcome (or just revert my last commit instead of > telling me the result). [...] > Thomson doesn't offer a license to users, they want to see a big > transaction from the developers/manufacturers of an mp3 encoder instead. Thompson didn't say "anyone can use our patents, except manufacturers or developers," so we don't have its permission to use them. They haven't given a licence to the authors of LAME, nor to us, nor to most of our users. We avoided, inconveniently, using the RSA and Lempel-Ziv (GIF) patents. Using this one illegally until Thompson asks us to stop, or sues us to make us stop, seems unwise. -- Trevor Johnson