From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Feb 13 17:07:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA24374
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lserver.infoworld.com (lserver.infoworld.com [192.216.48.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA24345
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:07:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Brett_Glass@infoworld.com
Received: from ccgate.infoworld.com (ccgate.infoworld.com [192.216.49.101]) 
  by lserver.infoworld.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/GNAC-GW-2.1) with SMTP id RAA10414
  for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ccMail by ccgate.infoworld.com (SMTPLINK V2.11)
	id AA855882119; Thu, 13 Feb 97 16:16:07 PST
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 97 16:16:07 PST
Message-Id: <9701138558.AA855882119@ccgate.infoworld.com>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Is it safe?
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I have two FreeBSD machines here -- one running a late SNAP of 2.1.5 and
another running 2.1.0-R. I'd been waiting to update them to 2.2.0-R, but
due to the recent break-in at cdrom.com I'm wondering if it is not best to
hold off -- especially because the ports and packages could have been
affected. Since the FreeBSD team didn't write these, and they're binaries,
they could hide Trojan horses very easily.

What was the last released version of FreeBSD before the earliest known
break-in?

--Brett