From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 21:12:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA11313 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 21:12:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from sag.space.lockheed.com (sag.space.lockheed.com [192.68.162.134]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA11308 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 21:12:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by sag.space.lockheed.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/21Nov95-0423PM) id AA21740; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 21:12:42 -0800 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 21:12:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Brian N. Handy" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Jake Hamby , Brandon Gillespie , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD comparison - it's time, I think! In-Reply-To: <17182.826156574@time.cdrom.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 Mar 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Good idea! What kind of benchmarks should we tell people to run, though? > > I'd say lmbench and the BYTE benchmarks, *if* you can get them to run. I posted another benchmark to -current a couple of days ago, but I haven't had time to muck with it. Here's the URL again: http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/HINT/ Happy Trails, Brian