From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 30 01:13:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B09AE56; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46348FC0C; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c122-106-175-26.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c122-106-175-26.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.175.26]) by mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qAU1DVPB012214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:13:33 +1100 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:13:31 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r243670 - head/share/man/man5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20121130121105.W1707@besplex.bde.org> References: <201211291251.qATCpA7w078277@svn.freebsd.org> <20121130110154.E1441@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=FoRdZBXq c=1 sm=1 a=bvcLnixDC-gA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=JzwRw_2MAAAA:8 a=TdF0Wd7UlPIA:10 a=wAwkY7PBfuqKK9cADVEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=bxQHXO5Py4tHmhUgaywp5w==:117 Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:13:37 -0000 On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 29 November 2012 19:09, Bruce Evans wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> "gcc" was mostly correct here, since the flags are unportable gcc ones. >> They don't work with any "cc", but may work with clang, although this >> is unclear since none of them is documented in clang(1). > > Every time I talk to the clang folk about flags they point me to gcc > documentation. That's where I look too. It doesn't cover clang extensions. >> However, I never would have agreed to putting any of them here. >> >> Lots here is now superseded by flags set by WARNS anyway. >> >> clang's even more unportable new flags are not documented in clang(1) >> and the settings here are too old to have dreamed of these. > > The reference to BDECFLAGS actually isn't true - there is no such > variable. There is a *commented out* version which I had planned to > email you about at some point. The whole file src/share/examples/etc consists of commented-out examples and comments about the examples, with most of its value in the latter. Bruce