Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:23:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tandberg TDC 3600 on CAM, 3.0-R Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9812101422290.515-100000@feral-gw> In-Reply-To: <199812102213.PAA02711@narnia.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If it prior to CCS, it won't have VPD info. I really don't follow what the quirk is supposed to accomplish. On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > In article <Pine.LNX.4.04.9812101044560.2006-100000@feral-gw> you wrote: > >> > >> I think that's a good idea, and in fact we've been planning on doing it for > >> a while. The idea is to add a SCSI revision field to the quirk entry > >> format, and then just not send serial number requests to anything < 2. > > > > You don't need a quirk entry. You know what revisions the device is when > > you do the initial inquiry. > > As long as there are no SCSI 1 devices that support that feature, > sure, but I don't really know if this is the case for every SCSI > I (or SCSI III) quirk or feature. The idea was to have a generic > SCSI I devive quirk entry that disabled all likely "unimplemented > in SCSI I" features, allowing you to add overriding entries for > more advanced SCSI I devices. > > -- > Justin > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9812101422290.515-100000>