From owner-cvs-all Sat Aug 14 23:23:57 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2F91519E; Sat, 14 Aug 1999 23:23:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA13793; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 08:22:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Greg Lehey Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha diskslice_machdep.c src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_cd.c scsi_da.c src/sys/contrib/dev/fla fla.c src/sys/dev/ata ata-disk.c atapi-fd.c src/sys/dev/ccd ccd.c src/sys/dev/ida ida_disk.c src/sys/dev/vinum vinumdaemon.c vinuminterrupt.c ... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Aug 1999 09:34:45 +0930." <19990815093445.E456@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 08:22:31 +0200 Message-ID: <13791.934698151@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >These calls are internal to vinum. Why should they go via BUF_STRATEGY? There are a number of things in the pipe line which makes use of the fact that the BUF_STRATEGY is used throught, one of these is the "struct ioreq" divorce from struct buf. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message