Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:17:23 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <200102131717.f1DHHNW39519@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "13 Feb 2001 18:04:21 %2B0100." <xzppugmv7je.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzppugmv7je.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpu25yv8fc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <XFMail.20010213114107.ak03@gte.com> <200102131658.f1DGw2E12845@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzppugmv7je.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
: Hmm? I must have seriously misunderstood all the discussions that went
: on around E-day.
What I had thought happened was that ld just uses the symbolic link
blindly. However, I just tried it on my system:
cd /usr/lib
cp libc.so.4 libc.so.4.1
ln -sf libc.so.4.1 libc.so
ldconfig -R
ldconfig -r | grep libc.so.4
33:-lc.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4
So it does look like it has to be a single number. Forget what I said
about 5.1 being a viable option.
My OpenBSD box does have minor numbers appended, but they also have
hacks in their ld to cope.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102131717.f1DHHNW39519>