From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 29 19:22:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB39B436; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F377222F1; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:22:35 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,985,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="8246314" Received: from lonpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.30.203.162]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 29 Aug 2013 19:22:34 +0000 Received: from [172.16.1.30] (10.68.19.166) by LONPMAILMX01.citrite.net (10.30.203.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.298.1; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: <521F9F79.60900@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:22:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival Subject: Re: [CFR] Event channel Interrupts and unified Xen interrupt infrastructure. References: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org> <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:22:36 -0000 On 29/08/13 21:15, Colin Percival wrote: > On 08/29/13 09:32, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_intr.diff >> >> I will continue my testing today and commit it tonight unless I hear complaints. Comments, corrections, improvements, and bug reports welcome. > > Could this patch be split into functional and non-functional components? It's > distracting having everything mixed up together in a single megapatch. Even > committing the s/unlikely/__predict_false/ separately would help. > > How do you intend to have Xen HVM work in the GENERIC kernel configuration? > Will you be adding 'options XENHVM' to GENERIC? I'm currently working on this, I expect to have a patch ready tomorrow (I still have to test it on bare metal). Roger.