From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Mar 14 13:39:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13722
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from icicle.winternet.com (adm@icicle.winternet.com [198.174.169.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13717
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by icicle.winternet.com (8.7.5/8.7.5) id PAA04233; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:39:03 -0600 (CST)
Posted-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:39:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fools.ecpnet.com(204.246.64.101) by icicle.winternet.com via smap (V2.0beta)
	id xma004209; Fri, 14 Mar 97 15:38:37 -0600
Received: from localhost (moke@localhost)
          by fools.ecpnet.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id PAA00928; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:35:11 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:35:10 -0600 (CST)
From: Jimbo Bahooli <moke@fools.ecpnet.com>
To: Andrzej Szydlo <andrzej@tu.kielce.pl>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPDIVERT
In-Reply-To: <199703141043.LAA18603@tu.kielce.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970314153423.923A-100000@fools.ecpnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



> > > > 
> > > > 	I'm wondering if anyone else here is using the DIVERT feature of
> > > > ipfw.  It seems to be causing my system to reboot under both 2.2 and 3.0.
> > > > This happens after natd 1.3 is run.  Anyone else having this problem?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > I've been using DIVERT with natd 1.3 on 2.2 (150297) for 3 days now.
> > > No problems so far, but I don't have much traffic passing through yet.
> > > What else do you run on your server? Do you get any messages before
> > > rebooting?
> > > 
> > > Andrzej
> > 
> > Not a single message, console just blanks and reboots.  It does not seem
> > to matter on traffic that much.  Traffic seems to cause the reboot faster,
> > but low traffic the reboot still comes. I am  going from ed0->natd->ppp0
> > so maybe there is possibly some wierd quirk somewhere in there. Yet that
> > seems the standard.
> > 
> Now I have a problem, too. I run ed0->natd->ed1. Sometimes it catches 11
> signal (segmentation violation) and dies. This doesn't harm anything else,
> except for network connections, of course. More Traffic doesn't seem to 
> cause it to happen faster. I'm going to look into it today. Do you run
> the newest 2.2?
> 
> Andrzej

Yep, I compile from the source code almost daily.