From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 11 09:21:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D54D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:21:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web26808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web26808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
	[217.146.176.84])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4300143D5C
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:21:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk)
Received: (qmail 88047 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2005 09:21:50 -0000
Message-ID: <20050311092150.88045.qmail@web26808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Received: from [194.248.174.58] by web26808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:21:49 CET
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:21:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Claus Guttesen <cguttesen@yahoo.dk>
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: ray@redshift.com
cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: performance modifications
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:21:52 -0000

> >No, this kernel-change is (fortunately) completely
> >transparent in relation to apache.
> >
> Ok, that was not the impression I got from accf_http
> man page.

I checked apache.org just to be shure :-)

http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/performance/2003-07/0071.html
gives some hints, and
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#acceptfilter
says that SO_ACCEPTFILTER is enabled by default. So
when

options         ACCEPT_FILTER_DATA
options         ACCEPT_FILTER_HTTP

is compiled into the kernel or accf_http is loaded,
apache "should" utilize this option.

regards
Claus