From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 9 11:23:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00985 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:23:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00977 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:23:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA57202; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:19:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions References: <17480.915909238@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 09 Jan 1999 20:19:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:13:58 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > If having sysctl descriptions in the kernel really is a problem for > > some people, it's trivial to add a kernel option to disable my code. > It is, just ask small@freebsd.org what adding a lot of text to the > kernel will do. You either did not read or did not understand what I wrote above. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message