From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 21:02:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C33106566B for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4462A8FC18 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so69979nfd.33 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:02:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZyRu4fwQ1mrIvngiyfT+MzNtTg9L9nnNOolRgb3ukyo=; b=MbTqD9Q+OvBUy3Nv435lJ7LfuduKx7Om+QIv2K7ydjiwY6xdeIrgQiVyMPV9ww5K8H OvNwhlQtrvVTigadYwOGlPwUWrM95l+2f7j++0JN5oEIMc4LSIM784fyF2Z9hKP0GW9A +fKr5taNersFSWbZr4QAVcwI+uAQcVCXZKHl0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FGRANZMkPF6fMB9wzWbIwWmMbbd8ohFcrRWcCUOPnE3o+8ZFxyxcnbdsKkkfNXYagQ zCNAzOAWh2tB00KOk3E3HWNc5mTcK7jlQV0EbTWhEXoR7gH6V5VQc2DO3pM+RW8GEwFH sRZQ6EnWv0oHWicMbZeu1UAmZrTmJcs/ChV6A= Received: by 10.210.133.19 with SMTP id g19mr1965998ebd.125.1235077378294; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:02:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t12sm4248532gvd.32.2009.02.19.13.02.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:02:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:02:53 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090219210253.3f288b8c@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090219211229.Y47625@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <499DBA8F.8090300@poughkeepsieschools.org> <20090219211229.Y47625@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: globally limit fetch download? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:03:00 -0000 On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:12:48 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > I have several FreeBSD machines located at different sites on very > > slow DSL lines. > > > > Is there a way that I can limit the bandwidth that fetch uses when > > it fetches ports? > you may do this and 1000 times more things using IPFirewall It's not a very efficient way to do it when the firewall is downstream of the bottleneck - it's also difficult to make it specific to port downloads. I'd go with wget. It's also good at handling unreliable lines, I used to use it when I was on dial-up