From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 20:29:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257581065674 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef-list@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (mail.writemehere.com [209.66.100.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2AD8FC2D for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stef-list@memberwebs.com) Received: from mx.npubs.com (avhost [209.66.100.194]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0E8C2BB7; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from northstar-srv2 (unknown [172.27.2.11]) by mx.npubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7CA8C2850; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Stef User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: syrinx@FreeBSD.org References: <20090120011951.D26228C282E@mx.npubs.com> <4975B8F3.7010008@quip.cz> <20090121032610.548568C2A3D@mx.npubs.com> <497719E9.1080107@quip.cz> <20090121131105.P45399@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20090121160023.960DC8C2862@mx.npubs.com> <61b573980901211147y48188ec1t2606faa420c67f40@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20090130200901.AA7CA8C2850@mx.npubs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsnmp module for monitoring jails: bsnmp-jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stef@memberwebs.com List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:29:27 -0000 Shteryana Shopova wrote: > Just to elaborate Bjoern's opinion - I hope I didn't give the impression I was trying to demand bsnmp-jails be included in FreeBSD. Although I do agree that something like this would be beneficial to have in the base system. All good points. I'll keep these on record. When work gets done on bsnmp-jails (not that much of a priority for me presently) I'll try to move in the directions you've outlined. Cheers and all the best, Stef