From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 12 22:33:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66D716A4C8 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net) Received: from farris.bafirst.com (adsl-065-081-102-002.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [65.81.102.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E7A43D88 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net) Received: from HOME.encontacto.net ([189.129.17.4]) by farris.bafirst.com with esmtp; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:32:39 -0600 id 0006D41D.4557A108.00012A5F Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by HOME.encontacto.net with local; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:32:39 -0600 id 0004AC29.4557A107.0000E84D Received: from dsl-189-129-17-4.prod-infinitum.com.mx (dsl-189-129-17-4.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.129.17.4]) by correo.encontacto.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:32:39 -0600 Message-ID: <20061112163239.lxudc9wz4sg4gk40@correo.encontacto.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:32:39 -0600 From: "eculp@encontacto.net" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20061112150545.4af6qgez6s8k0wc4@correo.bafirst.com> <200611122223.56905.freebsd-ports@dino.sk> <20061112160318.gw2me5iagc4kokkc@correo.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20061112160318.gw2me5iagc4kokkc@correo.encontacto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.2-cvs) Subject: Re: Can't do a portupgrade -rf on any of my mail/courier installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:33:20 -0000 Quoting "eculp@encontacto.net" : > Quoting Milan Obuch : > >> On Sunday 12 November 2006 22:05, eculp@bafirst.com wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> Strange problem trying to run portupgrade -rf mail/courier on both >>> current and 6.2-PRERELEASE with all ports up to date. Only one of the >>> machines has an older courier that I tried to update and get the error >>> so I decided I would build a package from one of the up to date >>> installations but much to my surprise I get the same error. One of >>> the installations I just built within the las 15 days so it would seem >>> that it can be built but not rebuilt which makes no sense to me. All >>> of the courier installations are working fine. This all came to light >>> with a portupgrade -afr on one machine. Same thing with a cd >>> /usr/ports/mail/courier; make >>> >>> Any suggestions appreciated. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> ed >>> >> >> This seems to be an issue with either fam or gamin as currently present i= n >> ports tree. I do not understand everything in detail, one does not =20 >> link (just >> as you showed), the second one builds but does not run (imapd dumps core,= so >> no usable imap server). If someone with more fam/gamin knowledge could he= lp >> here, it would be great. As a temporary workaround, you could comment out >> line in Makefile telling WITH_FAM=3D YES (or something similar is =20 >> there) and be >> just fine, loosing ENHANCED IDLE support, however. You could even =20 >> update this >> way to 0.53.3, by the way. I did not try to put this update into PR yet >> exactly due this fam/gamin issue. >> Regards, >> Milan > > Hi, Milan, > > The strange thing is that I built a new courier on Nov. 2. I =20 > installed it fine without having fam but it built gamin but then I =20 > had problems with courier until I built and installed fam and after =20 > that all was well. I didn't change anything else. From what you =20 > are saying and from the experience that I had, I would assume that =20 > what you suggest is basically what I did. That just might be worth =20 > a try but it seems a bit weird. Commenting out WITH_FAM=3D YES nor setting it to no didn't get the =20 desired results. It still tried to build fam and died at the same =20 place. Tomorrow, if I have time, I'll uninstall fam and try to =20 rebuild the way I did on my last installation. ed > > Thanks for the reply. As always your help is invaluable. You've =20 > really got the freebsd courier port down. > > ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"