From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 7 0:55:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.surf1.de [194.25.165.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12E437BE8A; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@big.endian.de) Received: from neutron.cichlids.com (p3E9D38C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.157.56.199]) by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA18539; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:55:51 +0200 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by neutron.cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E39AC30; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:56:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cichlids.cichlids.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BF16B14AA8; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:55:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:55:46 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: "David O'Brien" Cc: asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patches/ handling Message-ID: <20000607095546.B979@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org References: <20000605184259.A21736@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:02:10PM -0700 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@freebsd.org): > Why can't the patches' code be wrapped by "#ifdef __alpha__" and have a > single patch? That is a different issue, since we already suppor the patches.arch/ dirs. So _when_ they are used, I'd like to see that behaviour. I'll keep your #ifdef __alpha__ hint in mind, though :) Alex -- This is a FreeBSD advocacy ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message