Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:55:46 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: asami@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patches/ handling Message-ID: <20000607095546.B979@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:02:10PM -0700 References: <20000605184259.A21736@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@freebsd.org): > Why can't the patches' code be wrapped by "#ifdef __alpha__" and have a > single patch? That is a different issue, since we already suppor the patches.arch/ dirs. So _when_ they are used, I'd like to see that behaviour. I'll keep your #ifdef __alpha__ hint in mind, though :) Alex -- This is a FreeBSD advocacy ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000607095546.B979>