From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 30 3:12: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5892E37B423 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 03:12:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA73330; Wed, 30 May 2001 03:11:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3B14C764.9F43C581@DougBarton.net> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 03:11:48 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dima Dorfman Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Review of mdmfs port References: <20010530015416.9BE683E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Please review the attached (short) port of mdmfs Review number 1, the distfile is fennerized. :) But, before you commit the port please reconsider my offer to put this into the base directly, and have /etc/rc* call it as needed. It's about 50-50 whether the "bloat" is worth it, but when it comes down to it it's pretty much a wash because you'd have to include basically the same code to create the md /tmp anyway. Doug -- I need someone really bad. Are you really bad? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message