From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 25 13:44:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77A216A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:44:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from marko-tp.zavod.tel.fer.hr (marko-tp.zavod.tel.fer.hr
	[161.53.19.175])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F2543D54
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:44:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from zec@icir.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])i7PDiIqM011578
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:44:19 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from zec@icir.org)
From: Marko Zec <zec@icir.org>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:44:18 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200408242314.01915.zec@icir.org> <412BBDFA.5080508@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <412BBDFA.5080508@elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408251544.18759.zec@icir.org>
Subject: Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:44:25 -0000

On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
> You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
> be punnished by
> getting a CVS commit bit..?


Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow, 
glad to see that people still care about the 4.x branch.

Re that commit bit, what kind of commiter would that be who only likes to work 
on -STABLE? :)

Cheers,

Marko