From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 9 18:35:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE2D16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C743D1F for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59IWr2a046054; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:32:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:33:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040609.123309.98422136.imp@bsdimp.com> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040609151533.GA68949@tara.freenix.org> References: <20040609151533.GA68949@tara.freenix.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTP import coming question: location of crypto keys for ntpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:35:11 -0000 In message: <20040609151533.GA68949@tara.freenix.org> Ollivier Robert writes: : For the base system, I was thinking of maybe change it to something close : to "/etc/ntp" (in line with /etc/ppp & /etc/ssh). Seems good to me. : Is it worth the HEADS-UP/UPDATING note I'd need to put or do I just keep it : that way? I'd do both. Warner