From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri May  5  4:48:14 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mailgw.cablecom.ne.jp (mailgw.cablecom.ne.jp [202.248.199.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 93C6437B82D; Fri,  5 May 2000 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sada@bsdclub.org)
Received: from srv2.cablecom.ne.jp by mailgw.cablecom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) id UAA20555; Fri, 5 May 2000 20:47:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost by srv2.cablecom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) id UAA22207; Fri, 5 May 2000 20:47:50 +0900 (JST)
To: knu@idaemons.org
Cc: sada@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, tom@eborcom.com,
	girgen@partitur.se, cjh@kr.freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Introducing a netscape wrapper
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2000 19:06:31 +0900".
	<86u2gdmhug.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
From: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22] 1999-12/19(Sun)
Message-Id: <20000505204840K.sada@bsdclub.org>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 20:48:40 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 10
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <86u2gdmhug.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
knu@idaemons.org writes:

>> Everytime you find something in common with all the netscape ports'
>> wrappers, you can move it to the new wrapper, one by one.  That's what
>> I call "minimum changes".

I understand it.
But I don't understand why the new wrapper
should be an independent port.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message