From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep  1 14:58:35 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0100237B47F; Sun,  1 Sep 2002 14:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A297E43E6E; Sun,  1 Sep 2002 14:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mb@imp.ch)
Received: from nbs.imp.ch (nbs.imp.ch [157.161.4.7])
	by mail.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g81Lw6ka044423;
	Sun, 1 Sep 2002 23:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch)
Received: from levais.imp.ch (levais.imp.ch [157.161.4.66])
	by nbs.imp.ch (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g81Lw675193520;
	Sun, 1 Sep 2002 23:58:06 +0200 (MES)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:03:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Cc: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, <current@FreeBSD.org>,
	<developers@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress
In-Reply-To: <20020901144645.A16984-100000@wonky.feral.com>
Message-ID: <20020902000044.N12764-100000@levais.imp.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Hi,

> totally wrong, and this won't break things. I'm just a bit startled that
> this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't recall it being discussed) and
> just happens, with 10 minutes warning.

The 2.95.3 -> 3.1 prerelease upgrade was a big step.

3.1 prerelease -> 3.2 is a little step which fixes bugs, make
kde working (gif support) again, fixes X11 and mozilla ports.

> I don't mean to be hypercritical here, but I feel that it's fair,
> considering people are starting to really whine about how late 5.0
> actually *is* at this point, to begin to ask not even the *hard*
> questions, but medium firm questions about "gee, is this trip *really*
> necessary?"

I think yes. Gcc 3.1 prerelease had some nasty bugs.

Martin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message