From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 16:38:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0923A3; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 16:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E053E85; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 16:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4233312308; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 02:38:41 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro-2.local (c-174-51-225-141.hsd1.co.comcast.net [174.51.225.141]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.2.4-GA) with ESMTP id BTD90449 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 02:38:40 +1000 Message-ID: <53418310.7010702@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 10:38:40 -0600 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r264179 - in head/sys/amd64/vmm: . intel io References: <201404052243.s35MhNiL027981@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201404052243.s35MhNiL027981@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:38:48 -0000 > Make the vmm code compile with gcc too. Not entirely sure things are > correct for the pirbase test Then why not contact the authors/maintainers of this code ? We'll take it from here and will revert/rework this change, as well as making sure it compiles with gcc and also testing it, which for some reason you seem to think you are immune from. Not happy, Peter.