From owner-freebsd-security Mon Sep 14 13:50:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14864 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:50:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA14825 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 7642 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Sep 1998 20:49:39 +0000 (GMT) To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 14 Sep 1998 19:05:57 +0200" References: <4809.905792757@verdi.nethelp.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:49:39 +0200 Message-ID: <7640.905806179@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I had a question about this: > For high security situations I recommend against using the > standard inetd - better to use for instance Marcus Ranum's mini-inetd > (79 lines) where you can more easily convince yourself that the code does > what you want. so in case anybody is interested, the original Usenet message from Marcus Ranum, with the whole 79 line inetd replacement, is available at http://www.nethelp.no/net/inetd-mjr.txt Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message