From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Mar 12 17:23:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CF637B404; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDEC43FAF; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <2003031301230700100j91j8e>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:23:07 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2D1N6Wp014096; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:23:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2D1N69W014095; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:23:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:23:06 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Jason Hunt Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , "M. Warner Losh" , mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi patch Message-ID: <20030313012306.GB13869@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030301.093910.15267989.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030310232254.GA64763@intruder.bmah.org> <20030313002312.GB96009@lethargic.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313002312.GB96009@lethargic.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Jason Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 03:22:54PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > > > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > > > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. > >=20 > > Hi Warner-- > >=20 > > I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a > > Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. >=20 > Out of curiosity, what's so bad about these cards? I'll admit that I've > used nothing other than Lucent cards, but I don't find anything to > complain about with them. They seem to work fine talking to each other > and I can't complain about speeds or reliability of the signal. Maybe > it's just because I have nothing to compare them to? :) =46rom my perspective, the problem is that they *were* working fine, but *now* mine isn't. (Right now, my card probes but is otherwise not useful for actually moving bits through the air.) When it was working, I had no complaints about mine either. :-) (Fortunately, I have a spare Aironet card.) Bruce. --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+b9162MoxcVugUsMRArVhAKDE9jCtifmBA5OdmW0b/gx26rswdgCdHXi/ mYhAIQZC/qhrLzUdX37LUDI= =LSwz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message