From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 13:50:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4F016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA0D43D48 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:50:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20040128215039013008rtjue>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:50:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA07994; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:50:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:50:37 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro In-Reply-To: <20040128214405.GB23393@c7.campus.utcluj.ro> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large scale NAT - problem resolved X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:50:42 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:06:06PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and > > > > > > > ~2000 clients (cable modem network). > > > > > > > At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It'd be really interesting to see how natd would handle such a load.... > > > > > > > > > > > You must be kidding. ;) > > > > > > > > Agreed. NATd "crashes" with 400 clients on AMD Athlon 900Mhz. :( ipnat > > > > works fine. > > > > > > > > This raises a question... is there any point in still having natd? (don't > > > > throw rocks at me please, I'm just asking). Or maybe it's still being used > > > > for servers with less clients to nat? > > > > > > > If your Internet connection is 128kbit/s, it can cope with it nicely. > > > One day I will write the ng_nat(4) module. > > > > actually it can cope with a LOT more than that.. We see no degredation > > nating a 100Mb link.. (though not fully). > > I got ~400 (was 400, now 450 this year) clients on an 100Mbps link and it > only works with ipnat for me :( we only have a few "clients" so possibly it's related to that.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -- > > > Ruslan Ermilov > > > FreeBSD committer > > > ru@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > > -- > | Radu Bogdan 'veedee' Rusu > | NetSysAdm at campus dot utcluj dot ro > | Personal gallery at http://rbrusu.com > | ...mirroring FreeBSD and coffee > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >