From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 11 23: 3:38 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E158037B503; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9C60tF75312; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:00:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:00:55 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Tony Finch , John Baldwin , Doug Barton , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Warner Losh , Matt Dillon Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <20001012080055.A75268@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <15351.971315760@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15351.971315760@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 06:56:00PM -0700 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001012 04:00], Jordan Hubbard (jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) wrote: >> I think there should be an option for sshd *only*, possibly with >> `sendmail -q30m` (i.e. mail service without an smtp listener) -- i.e. > >What good would the sendmail option do? Why not simply turn it off? To be able to send at least outbound mail? Or is this answer too obvious? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message