From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 12:01:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0EB16A510 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:01:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [82.224.56.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2842E43D58 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id 55A1C2E4F; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:01:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:01:04 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: Samuel Tardieu , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041110120104.GB75769@tara.freenix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Tardieu , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <418C0EED.1060301@freebsd.org> <87oeibnp4r.fsf@beeblebrox.rfc1149.net> <20041107093907.GK79646@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041107093907.GK79646@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / PowerBook G4 - FreeBSD 5.0 / 2x PIII/800 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:01:01 -0000 According to Peter Jeremy: > What facilities are there to replicate the repository (ala CVSup or > CTM)? Publishing the repository is all very nice but doesn't help > someone who wants off-line access. There are several to achieve that but remember first that Arch being a distributed system, there are several repositories, all equal. The need that we have to have a blessed one (for integration, release, and so on) would be represented by a special archive (hosted on repoman) managed by RE. > Can it manage renaming files/directories? Yes. It even records permissions changes. > How does it handle 3-way merging? Yes. > Does it support merging branches back into the mainline without > duplicating the branch content? Yes. > What advantages does it have over CVS and/or Perforce? Dsitributed meaning that anyone can branch out of any archive and work even on a laptop on a plane, committing to that archive and merge afterwards with another archive for "publication". > How would you like to provide some real results of running GNU Arch > against the FreeBSD CVS repository: > - time to convert the FreeBSD CVS respository into an Arch repository. > - size of the resultant Arch repository. > - time to checkout HEAD src > - time to checkout RELENG_3 src > - amount of metadata associated with the above checkouts > - time to tag "src" or "ports" (eg for a release) > - time to checkin a 1 or 2 line change in one file > - time to checkin a large change (various changes in say 50 files). This is tremendous work as Arch and CVS don't manage modules the same way and I don't have time to do such benchmarking :( -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.6.0: Sun Oct 10 12:05:27 PDT 2004