From owner-cvs-gnu  Sun Mar 12 12:53:40 1995
Return-Path: cvs-gnu-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA22887 for cvs-gnu-outgoing; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:53:40 -0800
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA22879; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:53:34 -0800
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA25367; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 13:57:32 -0700
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 1995 13:57:32 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199503122057.NAA25367@trout.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
       "Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc Makefile" (Mar 12, 11:07am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc Makefile
Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com,
        cvs-gnu@freefall.cdrom.com
Sender: cvs-gnu-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > >   Add back the shared libgcc, now that we don't use it to link against.
> > 
> > Please make it static.  We *really* don't want to require folks to have
> > to get the shared libgcc for some binaries.  Why else would it be shared?
> > 
> 
> Explanation:  We only link against the static one, but old binaries still
> look for the dynamic one...

Except the old binaries are looking for a gcc that contains all of the
old symbols which only exist in libgcc.so.262.0, and the new version is
(and needs to be differnt) libgcc.so.263.0 since it has completely different
object in it.


Nate