From owner-cvs-gnu Sun Mar 12 12:53:40 1995 Return-Path: cvs-gnu-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA22887 for cvs-gnu-outgoing; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:53:40 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA22879; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 12:53:34 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id NAA25367; Sun, 12 Mar 1995 13:57:32 -0700 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 1995 13:57:32 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503122057.NAA25367@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp "Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc Makefile" (Mar 12, 11:07am) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc Makefile Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-gnu@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: cvs-gnu-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > Add back the shared libgcc, now that we don't use it to link against. > > > > Please make it static. We *really* don't want to require folks to have > > to get the shared libgcc for some binaries. Why else would it be shared? > > > > Explanation: We only link against the static one, but old binaries still > look for the dynamic one... Except the old binaries are looking for a gcc that contains all of the old symbols which only exist in libgcc.so.262.0, and the new version is (and needs to be differnt) libgcc.so.263.0 since it has completely different object in it. Nate