From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 23 14:46:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA18626 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [165.254.13.209]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA18621 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 14:46:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ppp-082.etinc.com (ppp-082.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA05645; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 17:48:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 17:48:56 -0500 Message-Id: <199602232248.RAA05645@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Terry Lambert From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Subject: Re: 230.400 bps on serial port Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >> >The Intel UART parts, as much as Dennis loves them >> >> Where the heck did you get this from? I don't "love" or perfer any async >> UART in >> general! > >The "dream machine" discussion... No. You suggested using a Zilog SIO controller for synchronous communications. I prefer dedicated HDLC protocol processors. The async part of it is irrelevant to me. dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX