From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 8 23:23:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from softweyr.com (softweyr.com [208.247.99.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB52C37B401 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 23:23:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from localhost.softweyr.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=softweyr.com ident=2945b2298c8e2b063b1d9e91e999fdbc) by softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 15JSfR-0000hR-00; Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:29:05 -0600 Message-ID: <3B493311.E4DAE613@softweyr.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:29:05 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? References: <200107081607.f68G7Cw04170@cwsys.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > I'd be just as happy if we forked our copy of nvi, now that I've > learned how to use the funky new (to myself) undo behaviour. > > For that matter this affects all of the *BSD's. Could we just > collaborate with NetBSD and OpenBSD to maintain a single version of nvi > or an unencumbered version of DB3 across the *BSD's? I'm sure the > other BSD projects are considering their options too. OpenSSH is a > good example of this. OpenVI.org hasn't been registered -- yet. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message