From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 26 05:48:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A3816A400 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED343D45 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE6262CAE7; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06815-01; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD5562CAE5; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:57 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B94C05E064; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B432D5C3C2; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:48:56 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <013501c6501c$ee8ecc40$6401a8c0@GRANT> Message-ID: <20060326014620.L4637@ganymede.hub.org> References: <013501c6501c$ee8ecc40$6401a8c0@GRANT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em device on 4.x: ifconfig alias issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:48:59 -0000 Nope, doesn't help ... I've been doing this for years now, and its all scripted, to make sure that I don't make a mistake like that ... its a reproducible issue with 4.x and the EM drivers ... or, rather, the 4-STABLE ones ... in fact, I have three servers with em devices, one of them I *haven't* upgraded to the latest, since I knew if I did, the problem itself would creep onto that machine ... the other two are running reasonably "new" (for 4.x, of course) -STABLE kernels, and both exhibit the problem ... I'm not overly concerned, it just takes 30-60 minutes for everything to usually time out and become visible on the 'Net again ... and, starting in April, we're going to be upgrading our servers to 6.x ... just figured I'd make sure there wasn't some command I was overlooking that I could give it a kick with, until then ... Thx though ... On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Grant Peel wrote: > Hi Marc, > > I don't pretend to know anything about Address Resolution and Routing, but > one thing I know (through many hours of frustration), is that an aliased > address (in your case, somehting like em0:23), IF the ip address being > aliases, belongs in the same subnet as anotherone on the same machine, the > second one must use a 255 subnet ( /0 ?). > > example: > > em0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 > em0_0 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.255 > ... > em0_23 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.192 > em0_43 10.10.10.11 255.255.255.255 > em0_59 10.10.10.15 255.255.255.255 > > Hope this helps, if not soory about the waste of time! > > -Grant > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664