From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 07:55:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB234106568A; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe01.swip.net [212.247.154.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F401D8FC2B; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=pW5Z-H8n_VoA:10 a=_6_vb1nlnQcA:10 a=NMGBx6iLSXY/3qZKdJo9Bw==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=V26Gi-mhlS2Ubpsm_kIA:9 a=yUohyMil2aWTgK4hbGIA:7 a=AIFCxzttIdze7HAiOTLRrlaUpBUA:4 a=lRjT1wxQ3FAA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from [62.113.135.207] (account mc467741@c2i.net [62.113.135.207] verified) by mailfe01.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.4b) with ESMTPA id 975623465; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:55:30 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:57:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807050028.48942.hselasky@c2i.net> <20080704224918.GA2145@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20080704224918.GA2145@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807050957.07900.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: usb@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:55:33 -0000 On Saturday 05 July 2008, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:28:47AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Friday 04 July 2008, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 July 2008, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:19 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > > > There was a discussion back in september about adding > > > > > > > support for basic CDC tty devices in umodem.c. > > > > > > > This lets you talk to a number of usb devices built around > > > > > > > microcontrollers (e.g. Atmel), and puts us on par with > > > > > > > Linux and Windows in terms of supporting these devices. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because this simply requires the small patch below to the > > > > > > > probe/attach routine, so if there are no objections I plan to > > > > > > > add this to the system (CURRENT then RELENG_7 and RELENG_6) in > > > > > > > the next few days. > > > > > > > > What about flow control? Is flow control required for these devices? > > > > > > the ones I am talking about don't implement any form of flow control. > > > I suppose they would otherwise match the previous check. > > > > > > luigi > > > > I mean, are you going to upload firmware through these interfaces? > > the OS only know about bytes. > > are firmware, software, data or random noise. > if you want to know whether the sam7 uploader works, yes it does. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Yes, but you know that umodem can drop data, if the buffers overflow ? --HPS