From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 02:29:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9F7106564A for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@kevlo.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73908FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (kevlo@kevlo.org [220.128.136.52] (may be forged)) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5E1JrRD014135; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:19:54 +0800 (CST) From: Kevin Lo To: Hans Petter Selasky In-Reply-To: <201106132150.54691.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <201106132150.54691.hselasky@c2i.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:19:24 +0800 Message-ID: <1308014364.2112.1.camel@nsl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB 3.0 support by default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:29:57 -0000 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > Should the "device xhci" be included by default in GENERIC for amd64 and i386 > before FreeBSD 9 is released? I can't find any reason why it's not here :) > --HPS Kevin