From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 5 21:15: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.dellroad.org (adsl-63-194-81-26.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.81.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A275A37B507; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@dellroad.org) Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (arch20m.dellroad.org [10.1.1.20]) by InterJet.dellroad.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA09479; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from archie@localhost) by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3644Fa75013; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:04:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200104060404.f3644Fa75013@arch20m.dellroad.org> Subject: Re: mbuf leak? fxp? In-Reply-To: <20010405194846.A22964@technokratis.com> "from Bosko Milekic at Apr 5, 2001 07:48:46 pm" To: Bosko Milekic Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bosko Milekic writes: > NMBUFS accordingly. Chances are, if you are explicitly declaring > `NMBCLUSTERS ' in your kernel configuration file, that you are > actually lowering the number of clusters/mbufs that would otherwise be > allowed with your given `maxusers' value (unless you have an unreasonably > low maxusers). Mmm.. I don't understand that.. can you explain? -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message