From owner-svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 04:24:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E4B85B; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8445B964; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0V4Ov1s044051; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:24:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r0V4OvE5044048; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:24:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:24:57 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Benjamin Kaduk Subject: Re: svn commit: r40807 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201301292324.r0TNOdit094312@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:24:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler X-BeenThere: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the doc tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:24:59 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> +

No matter what the application, you want your system's >> + resources performing at their full potential. &os;'s focus >> + on performance, networking, and storage, combined with easy >> + system administration and excellent documentation to allow > > "easy system administration" feels like it lacks proper parallelism here; > "its ease of system administration" is probably better. The "its" is not necessary. And "combined" is wrong for "to allow". Incidentally, I personally dislike the "you want" at the start of this paragraph. Docs or people are free to advise me, but should not be telling me what I want. Since I am not feeling smart enough to avoid this, what the heck:

No matter what the application, an operating system should take advantage of every resource available. &os;'s focus on performance, networking, and storage combines with ease of system administration and comprehensive documentation to realize the full potential of any computer.