From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 23 19:14:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6F737B94D for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 19:14:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA50496 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 19:14:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 19:14:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: fxp not "Etherexpress" any more? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm looking through online stores to try and find a good deal on our old friend "Intel Etherexpress Pro/100+" and it seems that Intel has dropped the "Etherexpress" word from the name, yes? I looked through the mail archives and this is the conclusion I come to, although I couldn't find an e-mail where someone came right out and said it. It's the 82559 chip, and it's listed on Intel's web site as their top of the line, whereas I could not find any references to "Etherexpress". Thanks, Doug -- "Live free or die" - State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message