From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 9 11:32:49 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02089 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:32:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02072 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA17531; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:31:30 +0100 (CET) To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions In-reply-to: Your message of "09 Jan 1999 20:19:38 +0100." Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 20:31:29 +0100 Message-ID: <17529.915910289@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> In message , Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >> > If having sysctl descriptions in the kernel really is a problem for >> > some people, it's trivial to add a kernel option to disable my code. >> It is, just ask small@freebsd.org what adding a lot of text to the >> kernel will do. > >You either did not read or did not understand what I wrote above. I did. You obviously didn't do your homework :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message